• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Birmingham, AL 35203
  • 205-502-2000
  • [email protected]
Call us now: 205-502-2000
Full-Service Law Firm
  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
    • Mitchel H. Boles
    • Jeffrey E. Holmes
    • William C. White, II
    • H. Hampton Boles
    • Clayton Tartt
    • Christopher Richardson
    • Nathan Holmes
    • Suzanne Norman
    • George W. “Wally” Walker, III
  • Personal
    • Criminal Defense
      • Arson
      • Assault
      • Burglary
      • Criminal Appeals
      • Criminally Negligent Homicide
      • Domestic Violence
      • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Distribution
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Drug Possession
      • Drug Trafficking
      • Federal Crimes
      • Federal Drug Crimes
      • Felonies vs Misdemeanors
      • Forgery
      • Fraudulent Use of a Credit Card
      • Gun Charges
      • Identity Theft
      • Kidnapping
      • Manslaughter
      • Marijuana
      • Murder
      • Negotiating a Worthless Negotiable Instrument
      • Operation Pilluted
      • Past Cases
      • Prescription Drugs
      • Property Crimes
      • Receiving Stolen Property
      • Robbery
      • Sale of Unregistered Securities
      • Shoplifting
      • Stalking
      • Theft / Embezzlement
      • Violent Crimes
      • Zohydro Arrests
    • Divorce and Family Law
      • Adultery
      • Alimony and Spousal Support
      • Annulments
      • Asset Location
      • Attorney Fee Recovery
      • Changing Alimony or Child Support
      • Child Custody
      • Child Relocation
      • Child Support Calculations
      • Child Visitation
      • Contested Divorce
      • Courthouses We Service
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Divorce of Same Sex Couples
      • Domestic Violence / Protection from Abuse
      • Enforcement of Divorce Decrees
      • Grandparents Rights
      • Grounds for Divorce
      • How to Prepare for a Child Custody Case
      • Joint Accounts in a Divorce
      • Jurisdiction and Venue
      • Legal Separation
      • Mediation in Divorce
      • Military Divorces
      • Paternity Rights
      • Parental Rights
      • Postnuptial Agreements / Prenuptial Agreements
      • Property and Asset Protection
      • Property in an Alabama Divorce
      • Reinstatement of Maiden Name
      • Retirement Accounts in a Divorce
      • Temporary Custody and Support Pendente Lite
      • Uncontested Divorce
    • DUI Defense
      • Alabama Drunk Driving Laws
      • Basic DUI Defense
      • Commercial Driver DUI
      • Common Mistakes in DUI Arrests
      • DUI Defense Overview
      • Driver’s License Suspension
      • Felony DUI
      • DUI FAQs
      • Refusal and Field Sobriety Tests
      • Repeat DUI
      • Toxicology Issues
      • Underage DUI
    • White Collar Defense & Investigations
      • Arson
      • Asset Forfeiture
      • Bankruptcy Fraud
      • Bribery and Blackmail
      • Business Fraud
      • Embezzlement / Theft
      • Environmental Crimes
      • Ethics Violations
      • Federal Crimes
      • Federal Program Fraud
      • Grand Jury Proceedings
      • Grand Larceny
      • Health Care Fraud
      • High Profile Cases
      • Hiring Illegal Aliens
      • Insurance Fraud
      • International Crimes
      • Internet Crimes
      • Mail Fraud / Wire Fraud
      • Money Laundering
      • Mortgage Fraud / Bank Fraud
      • Obstruction of Justice
      • Past White Collar Cases
      • Perjury
      • Ponzi Schemes
      • Price Fixing / Collusion
      • Protection of Professional Licenses
      • Public Corruption
      • RICO
      • Sarbanes Oxley
      • Securities / Broker Fraud
      • Unfair Competition
      • Unlawful Entry
      • Witness Representation
    • Wills and Probate
      • Advance Directive / Living Will
      • Business Dissolution
      • Conservatorships
      • Corporation Formation
      • Estate Administration
      • Estate Planning
      • Guardianships
      • Intestate Estates
      • LLC Formation
      • LLP Formation
      • Last Will an Testament FAQs
      • PC Formation
      • Powers of Attorney
      • Probate Wills
      • Trust
      • Will Drafting
  • Professional
    • Administrative Law
    • Appellate Litigation
    • Business Consulting
    • Business Formation & Dissolution
    • Business Litigation
    • Compliance
    • Directors’ & Officers’ Liability
    • Government Investigations
    • Government Relations
    • Healthcare
    • Labor & Employment
    • Outside Counsel
    • Professional License Protection
    • Regulatory Representation
    • Transactions
  • Blog
  • Media
  • Get in Touch
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
White Collar Crime

Section 1 – Trusts, restraint of trade

Trusts, Restraints of Trade - Alabama Outside Counsel

The first section of the Sherman Antitrust Act targets specific business conduct that is anticompetitive by nature. The text of the first provision reads:

Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.

Trusts – from this statutory language the courts have derived three essential elements to a violation of the first provision of the Sherman Act. The first and arguably most important element of such a violation is the existence of an agreement. This is to say a business cannot violate the first provision of the Act on its own. They must have a partner agree to participate in the anticompetitive activity. In the case of a conspiracy, the existence of an agreement can be hard to prove. Conspiracies are by definition secretive, and are often hard to detect.

Usually the existence of such an agreement must be inferred from the surrounding evidence. Although there must be alleged facts sufficient to make the existence of a conspiracy not only conceivable but plausible. The agreement element represents the actual collusion among businesses. This is prohibited because of its unwanted anticompetitive effect on major markets. The agreement requirement also puts some forms of anticompetitive conduct (such as price discrimination) beyond reach of the statute, since it takes at least two to form an agreement.

The second element of the first section of the Sherman Antitrust Act is that the agreement unreasonably restrains competition. The term “unreasonably” is crucial to interpretation of the statute, since it gives courts wide discretion in its interpretation and purports to draw the line between legal business conduct and illegal collusion. Since all monopolies are not inherently illegal, courts must consider whether a given monopoly came about as a result of a legitimately successful business plan or as a result of collusive or anticompetitive behavior.Sherman Antitrust Act

Courts begin to examine whether a restraint on competition is unreasonably caused by a collusive agreement. They are engaging in applying what is known as the “rule of reason.” The “rule of reason” is an interpretive policy that recognizes that mere possession of a monopoly is not illegal, unless the monopoly is the result of an unreasonable acquisition or maintenance of the monopoly. The “rule of reason stands in contrast to the per se rule, which automatically deems some activity to come within the purview of the statute. For example, price fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation schemes are both per se violations of section one. However, a judge will entertain arguments and personally interpret the statute if a monopoly has been acquired in a way that could be construed as an unreasonable restraint on competition.

The third element of a violation of the first section of the Sherman Act is that the activity affects interstate commerce. That is to say that purely local activity should be left to regulation by state and local authorities. However, elements like these have rarely been a problem for prosecutors. That can usually demonstrate a sufficient out-of-state ripple effect of almost any anticompetitive activity a business engages in. This was originally passed by Congress under their Constitutional enumerated power to regulate interstate commerce. The justification for the federal legislation is that anticompetitive conduct is harmful to interstate commerce. The third element of a violation of section one reaffirms the source of their authority.

In sum, under the Sherman Antitrust Act, in order to show a violation, the prosecution must prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The government must show the existence of an agreement, which unreasonably restrains competition, and affects interstate commerce. Price fixing schemes, bid rigging schemes, and market allocation schemes are all per se violations of the Act. For instance, can be prosecuted under the first section.

September 15, 2019
Tags: Court Case, Law, Our Rights, Plaintiff, Settlement
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on Reddit
https://i0.wp.com/alabamaoutsidecounsel.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/6020ee12b5fd30cf76f29cc0_book.jpg?fit=640%2C426&ssl=1 426 640 Nathan Holmes https://alabamaoutsidecounsel.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/613bc307f40b1cafd5e5dcff_BHW_GOLD-straight-across.png Nathan Holmes2019-09-15 06:19:002022-12-08 01:02:37Section 1 – Trusts, restraint of trade
You might also like
US Court of Appeals - Alabama Outside Counsel Boles Holmes White Attorney Wally Walker Assists in Securing Affirmance of $40 Million Settlement for Plaintiff Class
House Bill Would Allow for Seizure of Items Bought with Stolen Money - Alabama Outside Counsel House Bill Would Allow for Seizure of Items Bought with Stolen Money
NAP policy claims lead to federal scrutiny of Wiregrass farmers - Alabama Outside Counsel NAP policy claims lead to federal scrutiny of Wiregrass farmers
Victim or the Crime? - Alabama Outside Counsel Victim or the Crime?
Divorce and Objects with Emotional Value - Alabama Outside Counsel Divorce and Objects with Emotional Value
Child Support 411 - Alabama Outside Counsel Child Support 411
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Blog Categories

  • Civil Suits
  • Criminal Defense
  • DUI
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Probate Law
  • Trademark Law
  • White Collar Crime

Speak To An Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Featured In

PreviousNext

Boles Holmes White LLC is a full-service law firm providing transactional, litigation, government relations and white collar/criminal defense. We represent both businesses and individuals throughout the Southeast Region. As a full-service law firm with roots in the small town of Dothan and with large Birmingham firm experience, all of our attorneys strive to provide clients “big firm” representation with “small town” accessibility and personal attention. That is what sets us apart.

No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

OFFICES

BIRMINGHAM OFFICE
1929 3rd Ave. North, Suite 500
Birmingham, AL 35203
Phone: 205-502-2000

DOTHAN OFFICE
661 West Main Street
Dothan, AL 36301
Phone: 334-366-6086

AUBURN OFFICE
165 E. Magnolia Avenue, Suite 223
Auburn, Alabama 36830
Phone: 334-316-3446

LAWYERS

  • Mitchel H. Boles
  • Jeffrey E. Holmes
  • William C. White, II
  • H. Hampton Boles
  • Clayton Tartt
  • Christopher Richardson
  • Nathan Holmes
  • Suzanne Norman
  • George W. "Wally" Walker, III

WEBSITE & MARKETING

AdToms

SOCIAL

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2022 – 2023 Boles Holmes White LLC. All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclaimer

Lebron James’ “Taco Tuesday” Trademark Application Denied by USPTOPharmaceuticals in Our Water Part 3: - Boles Holmes WhitePharmaceuticals in our water - Alabama Outside CounselPharmaceuticals in Our Water: Part 1 – Introduction
Scroll to top

We use cookies to personalize your experience on AlabamaOutsideCounsel. Click OK to accept our privacy policy and terms of service.

OKCancel

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only